Google

00100001_00125000/108763 Index


    108763 17-.beta.-Amino-5-.alpha.-androstan-11-.beta.-ol 17.beta.-Am
    ino-5.alpha.-androstan-11.beta.-ol 5.alpha.-Androstan-11.bet
    a.-ol, 17.beta.-amino- 5668-07-5 Androstan-11-ol, 17-amino-,
    (5.alpha.,11.beta.,17.beta.)- NSC60795

    Smiles: OC1CC2(C)C(N)CCC2C3CCC4CCCCC4(C)C13

    pdb file: 108763.pdb
    sdf file: 108763.sdf

    Please note: images may show incorrect connectivity due to improper geometry. We will be working to improve this situation. For now, the left image should be correct, and the other two are correct, if they match the first.

    Image Links

    Molecule Name Links

    More coming soon!

    Back to top


    RSS News Feed
    Add
    Subscribe
    Add
    (syndicate freely:)

    PubChem Fields

      pubchem total charge
      0
      pubchem substance id
      108763
      pubchem substance version
      2
      pubchem ext datasource name
      DTP/NCI
      pubchem ext datasource regid
      60795
      pubchem substance comment
      DTP/NCI from molfile. Release-June 2007. Structure Evaluation:Consistent with Molecular Formula. Deposition record created from database webdb on host dtpiv1.ncifcrf.gov on Feb 22, 2008
      pubchem substance synonym
      17-.beta.-Amino-5-.alpha.-androstan-11-.beta.-ol 17.beta.-Amino-5.alpha.-androstan-11.beta.-ol 5.alpha.-Androstan-11.beta.-ol, 17.beta.-amino- 5668-07-5 Androstan-11-ol, 17-amino-, (5.alpha.,11.beta.,17.beta.)- NSC60795
      pubchem generic registry name
      5668-07-5
      pubchem xref ext id
      60795
      pubchem ext datasource url
      http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/
      pubchem ext substance url
      http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/dtpstandard/servlet/dwindex?searchtype=NSC&outputformat=html&searchlist=60795
      pubchem cid associations
      247022 1
      pubchem bondannotations
      9 1 5 12 2 5 3 22 6 4 23 5 5 24 6 6 17 5 7 19 5 8 25 6

    Other Related Links

    More coming soon! 


    
(:-#	I am smiling and I have braces (watch out for the glare!)
	said something he shouldn't have